Jenkins VS TeamCity
Jenkins and TeamCity serve as continuous integration (CI) tools that allow developers to integrate code branches during the development process and run a series of automated tests against them.
Although they cover much of the same thing, they do so in very different ways.
Jenkins
Jenkins is the most popular open-source automation server that was written in a java programming language. It facilitates the automation process of continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) in the software development process.
Jenkins supports over 1,400 plugins for other software tools. These plugins expand Jenkins into five years; platforms, UI, administration, source code management, and build management.
Jenkins is easy to install and use. It provides an impressive browser-hosted project management dashboard.
Some of the common reasons to evaluate and choose Jenkins are:
- Open-source and free
- Widely used and well documented
- Vibrant user community
- Integration with a large variety of tools and technologies.
- Plugin support
TeamCity
TeamCity is another commercial CI/CD server. It is also a java-based CI server package.
TeamCity is a build management tool and automation server. It was made by JetBrains. It permits users to customize on their own according to their environment and need.
The TeamCity server is a primary component, but the browser-hosted interface serves as the primary way to administer TeamCity users, projects, agents, and build configuration.
The TeamCity browser-hosted dashboard is outstanding. It handles project status and reporting information suitable for a broad range of users and project stakeholders. It provides drill-down detail, build progress, and history information on the projects and configurations.
There are many good reasons to choose TeamCity. Some other reasons to choose TeamCity include:
- Easy to setup, use, and configure
- Widely used and well documented
- Integration with a large variety of tools and technologies
- Professional server is free for up to twenty build configurations.
TeamCity provides limited features as freeware under some terms and conditions. It was based on server-based web application and supported servlet based servers like Apache Tomcat etc. It supports different platforms such as Rub, Java, and .NET.
Jenkins Vs. TeamCity Comparison Table
The following are the primary comparison between Jenkins and TeamCity:
| Jenkins | TeamCity |
|---|---|
| It was licensed under MIT license. | It was licensed under a proprietary commercial license. |
| It was developed by Oracle then Sun and was later open-sourced. | It was developed by JetBrains software company. |
| It supports CVS, Git, SubVersion, Mercurial, AccuRev, ClearCase, RTC | It supports CVS, Git, SubVersion, Perforce, IBM ClearCase, Mercurial, SourceGear Vault. |
| It supports Unix, Windows-like operating systems and Mac OS X | It concentrates completely on operating systems rather than a particular area. |
| It is open-source and free. | It is commercial and paid and has only a few features for free of cost. |
| It supports advanced features compared to TeamCity | It does not have advanced features. |
| It provides less security compared to TeamCity. | It provides more security features compared to Jenkins. |
| It is widely used across multiple organizations. | It is less used and has commercial features in it. |
| Jenkins is well documented and available in its open-source site. | TeamCity does not have well documentations provided by its site. |
| Jenkins is not easier to set up and configure. | TeamCity to easier to use, configure, and set up the installation and integrating with the version control system. |
| Jenkins does not have the individual validation feature. | Teamcity has individual validation feature. |
| Jenkins does not support port flexibility feature. | TeamCity has port flexibility feature. |
| Jenkins has plugin features and is having mostly plugin ecosystem. | TeamCity has out of box features with excellent build process history. |