Selenium Alternatives
Selenium is a free, open-source, platform-independent, most widely used software testing tool used to test web applications. It is developed in JavaScript. It supports various programming and scripting languages like Java, C#, PHP, Perl, Ruby, and Python. It is mainly used to perform various testings such as Functional test, Regression test, Acceptance test, Integration test, Smoke test, End to End test, Cross browse text, and more.
Pros of Selenium
A list of Pros of selenium is given below –
- It can be easily developed on Windows, Macintosh, and Linux.
- It helps us to easily test web applications.
- It supports various browsers like Chrome, Firefox, IE, Solaris, and Safari.
- It provides a tester-friendly environment.
- AngularJS developers easily use it.
Cons of Selenium
- It is not used to test desktop and mobile applications.
- It can’t perform database testing.
- It requires coding knowledge.
- It requires skilled testers.
- Selenium is not used to perform testing on images.
Although selenium is the best automation and testing tool for web applications, there are also some selenium alternatives available in the market.
A list of most commonly used selenium alternatives are given below –
- Protractor
- TestCraft
- Cucumber
- UFT (Unified Functional Test)
- IBM Rational Functional Tester
- SikuliX
- Telerik Test Studio
- Screenster
- Cypress
- Katalon Studio
- Ghost Inspector
- Robot Framework
1. Protractor
Protractor is the best selenium alternative. It is a free automation Angular-friendly E2E (end to end) testing framework used to test web applications. It helps us to combine various powerful frameworks like Selenium, Web driver, Jasmine, Moncha, and Node.js.
Pros of Protractor
There are the following Pros of Protractor –
- Protractor works for both Angular UIs as well as Non-Angular UIs.
- It supports other testing frameworks such as Cucumber, Jasmine, and Mocha.
- It allows us to run scripts in mobile browsers.
- Selenium is very easy to use because its syntax is simple.
- As compared to selenium, Protractor has extra locators.
Cons of Protractor
- Protractor is not suitable for non-Angular JavaScript applications.
- There is no robot class support in the Protractor.
- Issues related to updation.
- It is complicated for beginners.
Pricing
Protractor is available for both free as well as paid.
Website
Click on the given link to visit the Protractor Official website –
2. TestCraft
TestCraft is one of the best codeless selenium alternatives. It is a cloud-based automation platform for testing web applications. It uses unique visual modeling and AI technology that allows us to create the fastest test creation by eliminating test maintenance overhead.
TestCraft’s silent features are: It is fast, support multi-platform, it has a low maintenance cost, and it provides DevOps friendly environment.
Pros of TestCraft
- TestCraft allows us to run test cases on multiple platforms.
- Low maintenance cost and very easy-to-use.
- It uses an agile automation testing process to produce detailed results.
- It is very easy to find bugs.
- There is no need for a programming language.
Cons of TestCraft
- It is difficult to change the database.
- A high-speed Internet connection is required to use TestCraft
Pricing
TestCraft is available for both versions free as well as paid.
Website
Click on the given link to visit the TestCraft Official website – https://www.testcraft.io/
3. Cucumber
Cucumber is the most commonly used open-source testing tool that supports BDD (Behavior Driven Development). It is used with selenium for performing the acceptance testing. Cucumber is written in the Ruby programming language. Programming languages supported by Cucumber are Perl, PHP, Python, .Net, Java, C, etc.
Pros of Cucumber
There are the following pros of cucumber –
- Cucumber is easy-to-setup and easy-to-understand.
- It completely focuses on the end-user experience.
- It easily integrates with Lambda Test, BrowserStack, CrossBrowse, Experitest, Ghostlab, and more.
- It provides code reusability because it uses a simple test script architecture.
- It supports programming languages like Java, C, and Ruby.
Cons of Cucumber
- Teamwork reduction.
- It runs slower.
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about the Cucumber – https://cucumber.io/
4. UFT (Unified Functional Test)
UFT is also referred to as Quick Test Professional (QTP). It is one of the most popular selenium alternatives that is developed by Mercury Interactive. It is mainly used for functional and regression testing. It allows testers to execute test cases to find errors. It supports various different development environments such as SAP, Oracle, and more to perform testing.
Pros of UFT
There are the following pros of UFT –
- UFT is easy-to-use as compared to other test scripting languages because it uses VBScript language.
- It is used by both beginners as well as professional testers to find errors.
- It is used to test web-based, mobile, and desktop applications.
- It supports XML and easy to maintain.
- It integrates with Test management tools such as Quality Center, Winrunner, and Test Director.
- It supports continuous integration (CI) tools like Jenkins.
Cons of UFT
- It is not suitable for Linux and Mac OS.
- It is only used on Windows.
- As compared to other testing tools, UFT is very expensive.
- It is unable to run multiple threads.
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about the UFT –
5. IBM Rational Functional Tester
IBM Rational Functional Tester is the best regression testing and object-oriented functional testing tool that helps for regression, GUI, functional, and data-driven testing. It allows us to use various platforms such as Red Hat Linux, SUSE Linux, and Windows.
Pros of IBM Rational Functional Testing
There are the following Pros of IBM Rational Functional Testing –
- IBM Rational Functional Tester easily integrates with other software.
- It provides better visual editing through screenshots.
- It supports various different programming, scripting languages, applications, and protocols, like HTML, SAP, Eclipse, Flex, Visual Basic, GET, and PowerBuilder.
Cons of IBM Rational Functional Testing
- Updation was not always correct.
- Less browse support except for Internet Explorer (IE).
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about the IBM Rational Functional Testing – https://www.ibm.com/in-en/marketplace/rational-functional-tester
6. SikuliX
Sikulix is the best powerful and open-source selenium alternative developed by the Sikuli Lab. It uses OpenCV to identify Graphical User Interface (GUI) components. It is mainly used to remove the disadvantages that occurred in the selenium web driver.
Pros of SikuliX
A list of Pros of Sikulix is given below –
- SikuliX is used for both desktops as well as web applications.
- It is an easy-to-learn testing tool.
- It uses clean and more readable codes.
- It does not depend upon the machine speed, resolution, and other parameters.
- It allows users to take a screenshot of various GUI components like toolbar buttons, icons, dialogue boxes, check-boxes, radio buttons, and many more.
- It easily integrates with Robot Framework.
Cons of SikuliX
- In SikuliX, we face various issues related to maintainability.
Website:
Click on the given link to visit SikuliX official website – http://sikulix.com/
7. Telerik Test Studio
Telerik Test Studio is one of the best easy-to-use automation testing tools available in the market. It provides the best solutions for web, desktop, and mobile applications. It allows us to enable the recording and execution of web tests within a web browser like Chorme. It includes various cool features such as manual testing, API (Application Programming Interface) testing, Load testing, Test schedule, continuous integration (CI), parallel execution, as well as Visual Studio Plugins.
Pros of Telerik Test Studio
A list of pros of Telerik Test Studio is given below –
- Telerik Test Studio directly integrates with Git and Team Foundation Server (TFS).
- Lessor or no coding skills are required to use Telerik Test Studio.
- It is an easy-to-maintain Telerik Test Studio.
- It is an easy-to-learn and user-friendly platform.
Cons of Telerik Test Studio
- Telerik Test Studio uses relative object property that is challenging for users.
- Its license cost is high.
- It is not suitable for app testing and desktop application testing.
- It requires a powerful computer to run all capabilities.
- Extra VS professional is required to use the VS plugin.
Website
Click on the given link to test web applications – https://www.telerik.com/teststudio
8. Screenster
Screenster is one of the best cloud-based testing tools used to test websites. It is more effective than other selenium alternatives. It does not require programming knowledge to test web applications. It runs test cases as a part of Continuous Integration (CI).
Pros of Screenster
There are the following pros of Screenster –
- Screenster is an easy-to-use web application testing tool for non-technical users.
- We do not require programming and coding knowledge to use the Screenster testing tool.
- It is smooth as compared to other selenium testing tool.
- It is less expensive. Its basic package starts from $99 per month and it also provides a one-month free trial.
- It provides a faster way to automate visual testing.
- It provides various features such as automatic timeout management and auto-correcting smart selectors.
Cons of Screenster
- It provides slow speed.
- Less loading time
- The Firefox web browser does not support it.
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about the Screenster – https://screenster.io/
9. Cypress
Cypress is one of the most popular selenium alternatives. It is developed by Brian Mann. It is used to test mobile, web, as well as desktop applications. It is more powerful than other testing tools because it provides a complete end-to-end testing experience. Cypress dashboard builds up with a suite of Continuous Integration (CI) tests, records, and powerful insights.
Pros of Cypress
There are the following Pros of Cypress –
- Cypress is a simple and easy-to-use tool.
- It provides excellent debugging tools to test the applications.
- We do not need to load any changes that we do on our tests.
- It is one of the fastest, reliable, and better testing tool that runs in a browser.
- It successfully works on any website and front-end framework.
- API testing is possible using Cypress.
Cons of Cypress
- Events like file upload, scroll, and hover are not supported by the Cypress.
- It is a less user-friendly testing tool as compared to other selenium alternatives.
- A native mobile application such as swipe gesture is not supported by Cypress.
- It does not support IE11 and Safari browser.
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about Cypress – https://www.cypress.io/
10. Katalon Studio
Katalon Studio is the best, reliable, and more effective selenium alternative. It is an open-source, paid, easy-to-use, powerful automation testing tool that is used to test web, mobile, desktop, and REST administration applications with CI (Continuous Integration).
Pros of Katalon Studio
A list of Pros of Katalon Studio is given below –
- Katalon Studio is quick and easy-to-setup because it provides a UI-friendly environment.
- It provides a multi-testing environment.
- It easily integrates with SDLC, team collaboration, CI (Continuous Integration) and CD (Continuous Development) management, Jenkins, JIRA, and Git.
- It is supported by powerful web browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, and Internet Explorer (IE).
- It supports more than hundreds of in-built keywords.
Cons of Katalon Studio
- To write a script in the Katalon Studio, knowledge of Java and Groovy is required.
- It requires paid support.
- It is difficult to understand for non-technical testers.
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about the Katalon Studio – https://www.katalon.com/
11. Ghost Inspector
Ghost Inspector is a testing tool that allows us to test and monitor websites using a browser. Ghost Inspector includes website testing, visual testing, UI testing, browser testing, and end-to-end testing tool. It is used by large organizations to share the test cases among the team members.
Pros of Ghost Inspector
A list of Pros of Ghost Inspector is given below –
- To use Ghost Inspector, no programming knowledge is required.
- It is easy-to-manage.
- Its free trial available for 30 days.
- It is a simple, easy-to-use, and easy-to-manage testing tool.
Cons of Ghost Inspector
- Ghost Inspector is costly because its paid plan starts from $110 per month.
- Basic programming knowledge is required to use Ghost Inspector.
Website:
Click on the given link to know more about Ghost Inspector – https://ghostinspector.com/
12. Robot Framework
Robot is an open-source, extensible, and simple framework that allows us to test web, Android, as well as iOS applications. It is also used to test automation and robotic process automation (RPA).
Pros of Robot Framework
There are the following Pros of Robot Framework –
- It is an easy-to-learn Robot framework.
- It uses the Selenium WebDriver library.
- Its syntax is very simple and easy-to-understand.
- To use Robot Framework, no programming knowledge is required.
- It is a keyword-based platform, so users can create new keywords easily.
Cons of Robot Framework
- Robot Framework is complex to install.
- It supports less standalone test recorder tools.
- It is less flexible as compared to other selenium alternatives.
Website:
Click on the link to know more about the Robot Framework – https://robotframework.org/